Thank you Prof. Sergey : Yes 'Walker's Equation is wonderful'

[Wg Cdr Thomas Walker]

Dear Prof. Sergey,

Thank you very much for your response.

Yes, indeed I was thrilled and satisfied when I stumbled upon the beautiful
relation between 1 and all possible elements of rational numbers in 1998. I
understand it could have some unique application in 'signal processing' with
the tools of matrix added.

Also, the 'paradox on color' I mentioned is imprinted in my mind from
college days though the practcal application of this truth may be nothing.

I realised of late, that I must take the bull by horn on issues like
understanding of 'gravity' 'our universe' etc. as the number of years left
in my own life may be insufficient unless I work hard and fast.
So far, I humbly submit I have a long way to go in Physics to reach the
sublime understanding.
Of course I am a great admirer of people like
Euclid,Archimedes,Galeleo,Kepler,Newton,Einstein etc. and what they have
achieved.
Sometimes, instead of blindly accepting the concepts propunded by them I
would like to act as a typical 'doubting Thomas' which is the hallmark of my
approach.
Whether it is the need of ether, or the 'inability for force to act at a
distance' or the speed limit matter can reach, curvature of space, Existence
of Blackhole or understanding and interpreting Michelson Morley experiment
or Hubble's findings or 'lorentz transformation' [even] I don't want to make
any assumptions to reach a result or jump into any conclusions of expanding
universe or big bang or 11 dimensional string theory etc.
I would like to have my take by assimilating and understanding everything
[observations,measurements and their interpretation,every step in the
mathematical simulations and derivations and conclusions]

My dream is to have a unified understanding of
matter[atoms,molecules,particles,quantum mech,effect of force[weak &
strong],solids,liquids,gases,heavenly bodies forming entire universe] and
its relationship with unified Energy spectrum [heat,EM,Mechanical ,nuclear
or any other] during the lapse of Time [past,current and
future,relative,cyclic,repetitive] in the face of Actions
[Experimental,Automatic,Cause or Effect way,Natural,cosmic etc.]

Thank you for forwarding useful links and materials which I will study in
depth and get back to you.

Sometimes, I read to understand every point of view ; Occasionally one needs
to work out the problems afresh to avoid bias setting in.

I had a feeling that Prof. Hawking was the currently best scientist as far
as cosmic theory goes, so I thought of associating with him.

Opportunities in the sense : I would like to set up experiments such as 'a
set of light weight gears arranged in sequence with say 1:10 or 1:100 teeth
ratio to increase the speed of rotation of the last gear in the sequence to
achieve a periferal speed of the 'speed of light' etc.

with warm regards
Thomas Walker


----- Original Message -----
From: "Karavashkin Sergey" <***@yandex.ru>
To: <***@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: copy of email to Prof. Hawking - to be on the same page

Dear Professor Walker,
Congratulations! The mathematical solution that you have found is

beautiful, of course. But it relates rather to the theory of numbers than to
physics that is my occupation. In physics the problems are some other, and
more complicated than those which you describe. It is impossible to join the
relativity theory and its corollaries like black holes, big bang,
closed-loop universe ? with the mathematical and physical logic, as
Relativity is based on the distortion of modelling in the very its
underpinning. As far as I could understand from your post, you are applying
to Dr Hawking, suggesting, on one hand, some mixture of their understanding
with the understanding inadmissible for them, and on the other hand you are
seeking from them an opportunity to experiment. Nothing of surprise that
Hawking did not reply. The more that he knows our paper on black holes

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/contents5_2.html#blackhole
in which we showed not only that black holes are basically impossible but

that Hawking?s computations are incorrect. So he is sits tousy and pensive
and needs already not the corroboration of black holes but the way out.

Though, truly, having read your physical declaration, I also would not

reply you, if not your reference to an interesting mathematical solution. I
can say in response, before experimenting, one has to resolve in physics
several basic problems, and very complicated problems. With account of your
mathematical ability, I would suggest you to read attentively the basic
paper by Schwarzschild ?On gravity field of point mass in the Einsteinian
theory? (Schwarzschild K., Sitzungsber. d. Berl. Akad., 1916, S. 189) and to
pay attention that in the final expression (14) that describes
Schwarzschild?s metrics he did not do the reverse passing to the initial
coordinates which he had to. If one does this operation, the whole BH theory
dies without a sigh. Furthermore, the BH theory is much based on the idea of
collapse of the dust sphere which is unphysical. In our paper on entropy

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v6_1/entropy/p23/p23.html
we have mathematically described the real processes which take place

there. Nothing to say of any collapse. Mere geometrisation of general
relativity disregards the thermodynamic balance of action and counter-action
that takes place in compression. Of course, this is far from being all what
I would have to point. But if you really want to undertake physics, kindly
analyse these aspects.

Best to you,
Sergey Karavashkin

[Wg Cdr Thomas Walker]

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
Dear Prof. Sergey,
Thank you very much for your response.
Yes, indeed I was thrilled and satisfied when I stumbled upon the

beautiful

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
relation between 1 and all possible elements of rational numbers in 1998.

I

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
understand it could have some unique application in 'signal processing'

with

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
the tools of matrix added.
Also, the 'paradox on color' I mentioned is imprinted in my mind from
college days though the practcal application of this truth may be nothing.
I realised of late, that I must take the bull by horn on issues like
understanding of 'gravity' 'our universe' etc. as the number of years left
in my own life may be insufficient unless I work hard and fast.
So far, I humbly submit I have a long way to go in Physics to reach the
sublime understanding.
Of course I am a great admirer of people like
Euclid,Archimedes,Galeleo,Kepler,Newton,Einstein etc. and what they have
achieved.
Sometimes, instead of blindly accepting the concepts propunded by them I
would like to act as a typical 'doubting Thomas' which is the hallmark of

my

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
approach.
Whether it is the need of ether, or the 'inability for force to act at a
distance' or the speed limit matter can reach, curvature of space,

Existence

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
of Blackhole or understanding and interpreting Michelson Morley experiment
or Hubble's findings or 'lorentz transformation' [even] I don't want to

make

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
any assumptions to reach a result or jump into any conclusions of

expanding

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
universe or big bang or 11 dimensional string theory etc.
I would like to have my take by assimilating and understanding everything
[observations,measurements and their interpretation,every step in the
mathematical simulations and derivations and conclusions]
My dream is to have a unified understanding of
matter[atoms,molecules,particles,quantum mech,effect of force[weak &
strong],solids,liquids,gases,heavenly bodies forming entire universe] and
its relationship with unified Energy spectrum [heat,EM,Mechanical ,nuclear
or any other] during the lapse of Time [past,current and
future,relative,cyclic,repetitive] in the face of Actions
[Experimental,Automatic,Cause or Effect way,Natural,cosmic etc.]
Thank you for forwarding useful links and materials which I will study in
depth and get back to you.
Sometimes, I read to understand every point of view ; Occasionally one

needs

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
to work out the problems afresh to avoid bias setting in.
I had a feeling that Prof. Hawking was the currently best scientist as far
as cosmic theory goes, so I thought of associating with him.
Opportunities in the sense : I would like to set up experiments such as 'a
set of light weight gears arranged in sequence with say 1:10 or 1:100

teeth

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
ratio to increase the speed of rotation of the last gear in the sequence

to

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
achieve a periferal speed of the 'speed of light' etc.
with warm regards
Thomas Walker
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: copy of email to Prof. Hawking - to be on the same page

Dear Professor Walker,
Congratulations! The mathematical solution that you have found is

beautiful, of course. But it relates rather to the theory of numbers than

to

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
physics that is my occupation. In physics the problems are some other, and
more complicated than those which you describe. It is impossible to join

the

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
relativity theory and its corollaries like black holes, big bang,
closed-loop universe ? with the mathematical and physical logic, as
Relativity is based on the distortion of modelling in the very its
underpinning. As far as I could understand from your post, you are

applying

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
to Dr Hawking, suggesting, on one hand, some mixture of their

understanding

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
with the understanding inadmissible for them, and on the other hand you

are

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
seeking from them an opportunity to experiment. Nothing of surprise that
Hawking did not reply. The more that he knows our paper on black holes

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/contents5_2.html#blackhole
in which we showed not only that black holes are basically impossible

but

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
that Hawking?s computations are incorrect. So he is sits tousy and pensive
and needs already not the corroboration of black holes but the way out.

Though, truly, having read your physical declaration, I also would not

reply you, if not your reference to an interesting mathematical solution.

I

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
can say in response, before experimenting, one has to resolve in physics
several basic problems, and very complicated problems. With account of

your

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
mathematical ability, I would suggest you to read attentively the basic
paper by Schwarzschild ?On gravity field of point mass in the Einsteinian
theory? (Schwarzschild K., Sitzungsber. d. Berl. Akad., 1916, S. 189) and

to

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
pay attention that in the final expression (14) that describes
Schwarzschild?s metrics he did not do the reverse passing to the initial
coordinates which he had to. If one does this operation, the whole BH

theory

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
dies without a sigh. Furthermore, the BH theory is much based on the idea

of

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
collapse of the dust sphere which is unphysical. In our paper on entropy

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v6_1/entropy/p23/p23.html
we have mathematically described the real processes which take place

there. Nothing to say of any collapse. Mere geometrisation of general
relativity disregards the thermodynamic balance of action and

counter-action

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
that takes place in compression. Of course, this is far from being all

what

Post by Wg Cdr Thomas Walker
I would have to point. But if you really want to undertake physics, kindly
analyse these aspects.

Best to you,
Sergey Karavashkin

Original message
Hi, I sent the following email to Prof. Hawking,but got only an automated
reply.
Would like to share with others too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
**Automatic Reply**

Your email regarding "My interest in Physics" has been received.

Professor Hawking very much regrets that due to the severe limitations he
works under, and the huge amount of mail he receives, he may not have time
to write you a reply. All e-mail is read. We do not have the facilities
in to deal with the specific scientific enquiries, or theories we receive.

Please see the website http://www.hawking.org.uk for more information
about Professor Hawking, his life and his work.

Yours faithfully

David Pond

Graduate Assistant to
Professor S W Hawking CH CBE FRS

Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge,
CB3 0WA.
United Kingdom.

http://www.hawking.org.uk
Hi Prof. Stephen Hawking,

I have been wanting to contact you for sometime.

I have a lot of interest in physics which has attracted me most from
childhood. However, I became an electrical engineer, then a software
professional and had a career in the Indian Air Force and then at the
Central research Laboratory, Bharat electronics Bangalore etc.

My strength has been my ability to analyze and I am looking for still the
solutions that may exist for the Mysteries of the Universe.

I would like to discuss with you and seek to further my knowledge/clear
doubts if possible and if it is OK with you.

I am of course an amateur as far as Physics is concerned though my ideas may
be radical and following an unbending logic.

In maths I did find an equation 'Walker's Equation' as given in
http://www.wincowalker.com/

In short I believe : The solution to what's matter is not found or
adequately explained.
My Ideas :
It is ridiculous to think of Big Bang with the whole universe as 'one
point' as the start of the universe. Why should there be any start at all.
And why anticipate an end? When even the number of 'rational numbers' are
countless why can't the universe be endless. We have solar system and
similar systems,Galaxies and similar galaxies and may as well have our
universe and similar universes even if each one came from some big bang.
I do agree that I may not be able to follow an euclidian straight line as
the straightness may not be possible to physically create, but still I dont
see an end to the theoretical 'straight line' which will always be endless.
If something is limitting it what is beyond this limit. Therefore I don't
agree that space may have an end or limit.

The matter and universe is likely to have a 'steady state' behaviour of
matter creation and transformation and energy matter conversions.
In a radical way, I seem to think that at the heart of any bit of matter has
to be an equivalent of a 'Black Hole' because the gravitational attraction
being proportional to the inverse square of the distance, and therefore
infinite when the distance is zero and no matter can escape this attraction.
Only a nuclear force can break this and convert the entire mass into energy.
I need to find this unifying way of explaining this phenomena of Matter.

Another paradox :
Even when I was in college 40 years ago, I thought about the following
paradox. The color we see from objects around us comes from perception from
our own eye triggered probably by the frequency of the light. I might see a
color say 'red' only as I might perceive which could be quite different from
what another perceives or say what a dog or other animal sees as.
Even if somebody sees red the same way as I might see 'green' both will
point to that object and say that it is red. For each would have been told
from childhood that it is 'red' and it doesn't matter what hue it creates
inside the eye. May be the preference of color occurs due to this.

I have similarly lot of ideas on various things and would like to experiment
on all these until the last of my life. I need opportunities.

with best regards

Thomas Walker